DragonFly BSD
 

Issue1073

Title undo '-t n{s,m,h,d}' not implemented
Priority Status chatting
Superseder Nosy List thomas.nikolajsen
Assigned To Topics

Created on 2008-07-15.22:39:02 by thomas.nikolajsen, last changed 2008-07-15.23:27:01 by dillon.

Messages
msg4954 (view) Author: dillon Date: 2008-07-15.23:27:01
:
:undo -t flag only supports TID;
:but manual page, undo(1), and usage() also says '-t n{s,m,h,d}';
:will this be implemented before release?
:
:Otherwise I will adjust undo(1) and usage() to what is currently implemente=
:d.
:
:I think it is OK to just support '-t TID', as TID<->time is easy to get wit=
:h '-i'.
:
: -thomas

    No, it just supports TID for the release.  A few weeks I ago I 
    disconnected the TID calculation from real time and the -t n<blah>
    stuff was depending on the TID calculating being directly convertable
    to real time.

    I think generally speaking its best to do it by TID anyway, the 'X'
    seconds ago stuff was a moving target, it never worked very well.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>
msg4951 (view) Author: thomas.nikolajsen Date: 2008-07-15.22:39:01
undo -t flag only supports TID;
but manual page, undo(1), and usage() also says '-t n{s,m,h,d}';
will this be implemented before release?

Otherwise I will adjust undo(1) and usage() to what is currently implemented.

I think it is OK to just support '-t TID', as TID<->time is easy to get with '-i'.

 -thomas
History
Date User Action Args
2008-07-15 23:27:01dillonsetstatus: unread -> chatting
messages: + msg4954
2008-07-15 22:39:02thomas.nikolajsencreate