Bug #1476
We miss fdatasync()
| Status: | In Progress | Start date: | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Low | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: | - | % Done: | 0% |
|
| Category: | - | |||
| Target version: | - |
Description
Related todos
History
Updated by tuxillo 2 months ago
- Status changed from New to In Progress
- Assignee deleted (
0)
Hi,
Additional references that might be interesting:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=64875&cat=
http://infohost.nmt.edu/~eweiss/222_book/222_book/0201433079/ch03lev1sec13.html
http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=23618&seqNum=5
https://lkml.org/lkml/1997/10/14/7
As far as I understood it, the main difference between fsync() and fdatasync() is that the latter does not require metadata flushing, hence it might require less writes and it should be faster.
Regards,
Antonio Huete