https://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/https://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/favicon.ico?16293952082007-04-19T19:20:22ZDragonFlyBSD bugtrackerDragonFlyBSD - Bug #582: PF states bughttps://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/582?journal_id=25312007-04-19T19:20:22Zcorecode
<ul></ul><p>I cannot reproduce this on 1.9-DEVEL. Does this problem persist?</p> DragonFlyBSD - Bug #582: PF states bughttps://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/582?journal_id=25362007-04-19T20:18:02Zbastyaelvtars
<ul></ul><p>On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:20:22 -0000<br />"Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <<a class="email" href="mailto:bugs@crater.dragonflybsd.org">bugs@crater.dragonflybsd.org</a>> wrote:</p>
<p>Don't know, is DEVEL stable enough for me to try? Just asking because I can only try this on aproduction machine. If yes, then I'll post feedback on this next week.</p> DragonFlyBSD - Bug #582: PF states bughttps://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/582?journal_id=25382007-04-19T21:15:01Zcorecode
<ul></ul><p>Ah, don't worry. Does it persist on 1.8-RELEASE?</p>
<p>cheers<br /> simon</p> DragonFlyBSD - Bug #582: PF states bughttps://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/582?journal_id=25392007-04-19T21:33:00Zbastyaelvtars
<ul></ul><p>On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:15:01 -0000<br />Simon 'corecode' Schubert <<a class="email" href="mailto:bugs@lists.dragonflybsd.org">bugs@lists.dragonflybsd.org</a>> wrote:</p>
<p>Yes.</p>
<p>-------------------------------------------------<br />szg@fw:/home/szg# pfctl <del>F all<br />rules cleared<br />nat cleared<br />1 tables deleted.<br />altq cleared<br />130 states cleared<br />source tracking entries cleared<br />pf: statistics cleared<br />------------------------------------------------</del><br />After a few minutes (NB: this is a bridge filtering 70 hosts which are doing soooo much P2P:<br />-------------------------------------------------<br />szg@fw:/home/szg# pfctl -si<br />Status: Enabled for 0 days 23:06:11 Debug: Urgent</p>
<p>Hostid: 0xbaafed3e</p>
<p>Interface Stats for sk1 IPv4 IPv6<br /> Bytes In 72602328 0<br /> Bytes Out 272202489 0<br /> Packets In<br /> Passed 203338 0<br /> Blocked 22 0<br /> Packets Out<br /> Passed 292272 0<br /> Blocked 0 0</p>
<p>State Table Total Rate<br /> current entries 0 <br /> searches 1983044 23.8/s<br /> inserts 0 0.0/s<br /> removals 0 0.0/s<br />Counters<br /> match 1983044 23.8/s<br /> bad-offset 0 0.0/s<br /> fragment 0 0.0/s<br /> short 36 0.0/s<br /> normalize 0 0.0/s<br /> memory 0 0.0/s<br />szg@fw:/home/szg# uname <del>a<br />DragonFly fw.jancso.szote.u-szeged.hu 1.8.1-RELEASE DragonFly 1.8.1-RELEASE <a class="issue tracker-1 status-5 priority-3 priority-lowest closed" title="Bug: sys/dev cleanup (Closed)" href="https://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/5">#5</a>: Tue Mar 27 23:27:44 CEST 2007 <a class="email" href="mailto:szg@fw.jancso.szote.u-szeged.hu">szg@fw.jancso.szote.u-szeged.hu</a>:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BRIDGE i386<br />------------------------------------------------</del></p>
<p>Since the number of matches keep increasing on each information query, I suspect that this is actually an error in query/response to it, maybe there are actual states (any way to check that?)</p> DragonFlyBSD - Bug #582: PF states bughttps://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/582?journal_id=32922007-07-17T03:18:01Zbastyaelvtars
<ul></ul><p>As this bug has been marked as a blocker for 1.10, and I am the<br />reporter, I would like to rephrase my last question:</p>
<p>Is there an actual way to get whether new states are actually created?<br />You can supply me a patch that e. g. writes a log entry after having<br />created a state or does a notification in a different way, it just has<br />to be kernel-level, since the only problem may be that PF fails to<br />report state info back to userland if a flush has been done.</p>
<p>If states get created just pfctl and pftop cannot retrieve this<br />information, I consider the issue a minor annoyance (and not a release<br />blocker in any way), since it does not impair PF's actual work.</p> DragonFlyBSD - Bug #582: PF states bughttps://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/582?journal_id=73352009-09-09T03:56:38Zalexh
<ul></ul><p>anyone still experiences this issue?<br />Should be long solved since it used to be a blocker for 1.10-RELEASE ;)</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />Alex Hornung</p> DragonFlyBSD - Bug #582: PF states bughttps://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/582?journal_id=87742010-08-13T20:29:28Zsjg
<ul></ul><p>pf was recently updated in master, does it fix this issue?</p> DragonFlyBSD - Bug #582: PF states bughttps://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/582?journal_id=142652022-05-15T16:13:31Ztuxillo
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>Closed</i></li><li><strong>Assignee</strong> deleted (<del><i>0</i></del>)</li></ul><p>PF has been updated at least twice since this was reported and additional work has been done on top of it, too. Closing this issue.<br />Please report it on a new issue if it still happens in newer versions of dfly.</p>