DragonFlyBSD

The attached patch replaces `int' with `id_t' wherever appropriate. I have done
a build{world,kernel} and install{world,kernel} and I don't broke anything. Plus
some test cases I have, continue to pass.

I withdraw the patch for the moment and I'll provide a better one soon.

Cheers,
Stathis

:The attached patch replaces `int' with `id_t' wherever appropriate. I have =
:done
:a build{world,kernel} and install{world,kernel} and I don't broke anything.=
: Plus
:some test cases I have, continue to pass.
:
:If anyone objects to this patch speak now or forever hold your peace!
:
:Cheers,
:Stathis

I dunno.  id_t is declared in GCC's sys-types.h.  I don't see it in
    any of our own header files.  pid_t might be the better choice there,
    since pid_t is also used for things like setpgrp() and setpgid().

-Matt

anything new about this?

Hi,

I was wondering ... where's the patch?

Cheers,
Antonio Huete

Okay, I see it at the bottom. I was expecting to have it in the top part just
like others.

Sorry for the noise.

id_t is defined in our sys/types.h as described in posix (look for types.h in
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/)

It says:
id_t
Used as a general identifier; can be used to contain at least a pid_t,
uid_t, or gid_t.

So from my understanding I think it is okay to use id_t.

Regards,
Antonio Huete

Standards say it should be an id_t, so I'd say this is a valid issue.