Bug #615

diskless.pach

Added by thomas.nikolajsen over 7 years ago. Updated over 7 years ago.

Status:ClosedStart date:
Priority:NormalDue date:
Assignee:-% Done:

0%

Category:-
Target version:-

Description

Also:
- we don't have /stand; gzip(1) and cpio(1) lives in /usr/bin
New patch attached.

Do we need to use absolute path names for commands? PATH is set in /etc/rc.
We still use lots of commands in /ec/rc.d/*diskless w/o absolute path name.

-thomas

diskless.2.patch Magnifier (5.38 KB) thomas.nikolajsen, 04/25/2007 09:57 PM

History

#1 Updated by dillon over 7 years ago

:Also:
: - we don't have /stand; gzip(1) and cpio(1) lives in /usr/bin
:New patch attached.
:
:Do we need to use absolute path names for commands? PATH is set in /etc/rc.
:We still use lots of commands in /ec/rc.d/*diskless w/o absolute path name.
:
: -thomas

Ok, I've committed it. Since it was broken originally its ok if
we wind up doing a couple of commits to get it right.

Generally speaking, its a good idea to use absolute paths in the
RC scripts because they can be called from several different contexts.

-Matt

Also available in: Atom PDF