Project

General

Profile

Actions
Copy link

Bug #615

closed

diskless.pach

Added by thomas.nikolajsen almost 17 years ago. Updated almost 17 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
-
Target version:
-
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:

Description

Also:
- we don't have /stand; gzip(1) and cpio(1) lives in /usr/bin
New patch attached.

Do we need to use absolute path names for commands? PATH is set in /etc/rc.
We still use lots of commands in /ec/rc.d/*diskless w/o absolute path name.

-thomas

Files

diskless.2.patch (5.38 KB) diskless.2.patch thomas.nikolajsen, 04/25/2007 09:57 PM
Actions
Copy link
 #1

Updated by dillon almost 17 years ago

:Also:
: - we don't have /stand; gzip(1) and cpio(1) lives in /usr/bin
:New patch attached.
:
:Do we need to use absolute path names for commands? PATH is set in /etc/rc.
:We still use lots of commands in /ec/rc.d/*diskless w/o absolute path name.
:
: -thomas

Ok, I've committed it.  Since it was broken originally its ok if
     we wind up doing a couple of commits to get it right.
Generally speaking, its a good idea to use absolute paths in the
     RC scripts because they can be called from several different contexts.
-Matt
Actions
Copy link

Also available in: Atom PDF