Project

General

Profile

Submit #1398

Updated by tuxillo about 5 years ago

Salute.



hdestroy(3) frees the memory pointed to by the hash key. In other words it

expects the user to always have malloc()'ed rather than used static allocation

for the hash key. This doesn't apply to the data associated with the key.



Although POSIX standard doesn't say much on this particular topic:



1) This is unnecessarily restrictive. If the user wants static allocation, we

should allow this. If she wants dynamic then let *her* free the memory she

malloc()'ed.



2) It is in conflict with the example code in the POSIX page. The code

segfaults if you add an hdestroy() call in the end of it.



3) Programs that target other implementations may segfault in DragonFly (that's

how I discovered it). AFAIK sunOS 5.10 and a recent glibc work fine, whereas

{Net, Free, DragonFly}BSD all are affected because they share the same code.

(One could argue that all programs written with the *BSD version in mind would

result in a memory leak. But still I think these programs (if any) should be fixed.)



Any thoughts ?



Cheers,

Stathis

Back