Bug #1088
closed
patch for ICH9 SATA controller
0%
Description
Hi,
If you are using ICH9 SATA controller please test following patch:
http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/ata-chipset.c.diff
It should apply cleanly on both 2.0 and HEAD.
Best Regards,
sephe
Updated by matthias over 16 years ago
He Sephe,
Tested the patch with the following controller:
atapci2: <Intel ICH9 SATA300 controller> port
0x3420-0x342f,0x3430-0x343f,0x3490-0x3493,0x3460-0x3467,0x3494-0x3497,0x3468-0x346f
irq 9
at device 31.2 on pci0
Works fine (until now :) Is there any ``visible'' difference or should
I just check that the machine/controller is up and running?
Regards
Matthias
Updated by sepherosa over 16 years ago
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 7:57 PM, Matthias Schmidt
<matthias@dragonflybsd.org> wrote:
He Sephe,
- Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
Hi,
If you are using ICH9 SATA controller please test following patch:
http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/ata-chipset.c.diffTested the patch with the following controller:
atapci2: <Intel ICH9 SATA300 controller> port
0x3420-0x342f,0x3430-0x343f,0x3490-0x3493,0x3460-0x3467,0x3494-0x3497,0x3468-0x346f
irq 9
at device 31.2 on pci0Works fine (until now :) Is there any ``visible'' difference or should
I just check that the machine/controller is up and running?
I don't think there will be visible difference. Checking your box is
up and run should be enough :)
Best Regards,
sephe
Updated by
Updated by sepherosa about 16 years ago
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Aggelos Economopoulos
<bugs@lists.dragonflybsd.org> wrote:
Aggelos Economopoulos <aoiko@cc.ece.ntua.gr> added the comment:
Sephe, wanna commit the patch?
OK, will do.
Best Regards,
sephe