DragonFlyBSD

He Sephe,

Tested the patch with the following controller:

atapci2: <Intel ICH9 SATA300 controller> port
0x3420-0x342f,0x3430-0x343f,0x3490-0x3493,0x3460-0x3467,0x3494-0x3497,0x3468-0x346f
irq 9
at device 31.2 on pci0

Works fine (until now :) Is there any ``visible'' difference or should
I just check that the machine/controller is up and running?

Regards

Matthias

On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 7:57 PM, Matthias Schmidt
<matthias@dragonflybsd.org> wrote:

He Sephe,

• Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:

Hi,

If you are using ICH9 SATA controller please test following patch:
http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/ata-chipset.c.diff

Tested the patch with the following controller:

atapci2: <Intel ICH9 SATA300 controller> port
0x3420-0x342f,0x3430-0x343f,0x3490-0x3493,0x3460-0x3467,0x3494-0x3497,0x3468-0x346f
irq 9
at device 31.2 on pci0

Works fine (until now :) Is there any ``visible'' difference or should
I just check that the machine/controller is up and running?

I don't think there will be visible difference. Checking your box is
up and run should be enough :)

Best Regards,
sephe

Sephe, wanna commit the patch?

On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Aggelos Economopoulos
<bugs@lists.dragonflybsd.org> wrote:

Aggelos Economopoulos <aoiko@cc.ece.ntua.gr> added the comment:

Sephe, wanna commit the patch?

OK, will do.

Best Regards,
sephe

committed by sephe@