Bug #2443
closedA bug in cp
0%
Description
Hello!
I recently found a bug in cp in FreeBSD-7.3 that was corrected in FreeBSD-9.
I checked DragonflyBSD's cp and the bug's still there.
It's easy to reproduce:
$ uname -a
DragonFly jb.umc8.ru 3.0-RELEASE DragonFly v3.0.2.30.ge2c75-RELEASE #0: Sat Apr 21 21:10:43 CEST 2012 root@jb.umc8.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/X86_64_GENERIC x86_64
$ rm -rf a b
$ mkdir a b
$ cp -rp a/ b/
cp: utimes: b/a: No such file or directory
cp: chown: b/a: No such file or directory
cp: chmod: b/a: No such file or directory
cp: chflags: b/a: No such file or directory
That's what how it works under FreeBSD-9:
$ uname -a
FreeBSD msk.umc8.ru 9.1-RC2 FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 #4: Sun Oct 28 21:29:09 MSK 2012 root@msk.umc8.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
$ rm -rf a b
$ mkdir a b
$ cp -rp a/ b/
This command actually doesn't do anything, but it causes a failure if the shell is executed with -e option.
--
Aleksej Lebedev
Updated by marino about 12 years ago
- Assignee set to dragonflybsd1
I have definitely run into this even on the master branch and I knew that DragonFly behavior was different that FreeBSD behavior.
What I don't know is why it's considered a bug.
Was there a PR written against FreeBSD that would outline posix standard, etc?
I will attempt to find proof that this is indeed buggy behavior, but if you have proof already it would be nice to post it here.
Updated by marino about 12 years ago
- Status changed from New to Closed