Bug #335

test issue

Added by corecode about 8 years ago. Updated almost 8 years ago.

Status:ClosedStart date:
Priority:NormalDue date:
Assignee:-% Done:

0%

Category:-
Target version:-

Description

test issue?

History

#1 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

moo

#2 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

test nosy

#3 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

hua?

#4 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

more test

#5 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

honk

#6 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

hu

#7 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

terter

#8 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

asdsad

#9 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

dddd

#10 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

test

#11 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

sdfsdfsd

#12 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

sdf

#13 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

dfgdfg

#14 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

sdfsdf

#15 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

jkhkhj

#16 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

testing

#17 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

moo

#18 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

testing, please ignore

#19 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

testing, please ignore (take 243)

#20 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> Simon 'corecode' Schubert <> added the comment:
>
> testing, please ignore (take 243)

seems the bugs<->mail gateway works!

#21 Updated by justin about 8 years ago

On Sat, September 30, 2006 8:51 pm, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
>> testing, please ignore (take 243)
>
> seems the bugs<->mail gateway works!
>

Can you set RoundUp to only send mail if it's not something it recieved
from bugs@? Otherwise, we're going to have an extra email for each
reported item.

Also, can a URL to the bugs.dragonflybsd.org web page for that 'thread' be
included in each mail? It'll make it easier to get to, both from anyone's
inbox and from the mail archive.

#22 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
> Can you set RoundUp to only send mail if it's not something it recieved
> from bugs@? Otherwise, we're going to have an extra email for each
> reported item.

That's what I spent 5 hours yesterday on. If you look close, you'll notice that there is always just one mail per entry. Either it was sent to the mailing list manually, then roundup won't send the same message to the list again (would create a loop). If a reply was added in the web interface, a mail is sent to the mailing list.

> Also, can a URL to the bugs.dragonflybsd.org web page for that 'thread' be
> included in each mail? It'll make it easier to get to, both from anyone's
> inbox and from the mail archive.

Also this already happens. Of course mails which get sent directly to bugs@ don't contain this.

Maybe to clarify this: roundup is just hooked on the mailing list (receive/send), it is *not* (yet?) in the middle of the mail flow.

cheers
simon

#23 Updated by jontro about 8 years ago

Is it meant to reply for each entry as it does now?
I'd say web only comments and not status changes are needed.

On 10/1/06, Simon 'corecode' Schubert <> wrote:
>
> Simon 'corecode' Schubert <> added the comment:
>
> Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
> > Can you set RoundUp to only send mail if it's not something it recieved
> > from bugs@? Otherwise, we're going to have an extra email for each
> > reported item.
>
> That's what I spent 5 hours yesterday on. If you look close, you'll notice that there is always just one mail per entry. Either it was sent to the mailing list manually, then roundup won't send the same message to the list again (would create a loop). If a reply was added in the web interface, a mail is sent to the mailing list.
>
> > Also, can a URL to the bugs.dragonflybsd.org web page for that 'thread' be
> > included in each mail? It'll make it easier to get to, both from anyone's
> > inbox and from the mail archive.
>
> Also this already happens. Of course mails which get sent directly to bugs@ don't contain this.
>
> Maybe to clarify this: roundup is just hooked on the mailing list (receive/send), it is *not* (yet?) in the middle of the mail flow.
>
> cheers
> simon
>
> _______________________________________________________
> DragonFly issue tracker <>
> <http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issue335>
> _______________________________________________________
>
>

#24 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

Jonas Trollvik wrote:
> Is it meant to reply for each entry as it does now?
> I'd say web only comments and not status changes are needed.

What do you mean with "reply"? If you mean that it should only send a mail to the list when there is a message added and not just when some status was changed: yes, that's already happening. All mails going to the list have content.

cheers
simon

#25 Updated by jontro about 8 years ago

yes but is the "duplicate" mail really needed, Right now this thread
is 10 e-mails long when there is only 5 real messages.
What Im saying is that the system only needs to send out mail when the
message is added from the system.

On 10/1/06, Simon 'corecode' Schubert <> wrote:
> Jonas Trollvik wrote:
> > Is it meant to reply for each entry as it does now?
> > I'd say web only comments and not status changes are needed.
>
> What do you mean with "reply"? If you mean that it should only send a mail to the list when there is a message added and not just when some status was changed: yes, that's already happening. All mails going to the list have content.
>
> cheers
> simon
>
> --
> Serve - BSD +++ RENT this banner advert +++ ASCII Ribbon /"\
> Work - Mac +++ space for low €€€ NOW!1 +++ Campaign \ /
> Party Enjoy Relax | http://dragonflybsd.org Against HTML \
> Dude 2c 2 the max ! http://golden-apple.biz Mail + News / \
>
>
>
>

#26 Updated by bill.marquette about 8 years ago

On 10/1/06, Jonas Trollvik <> wrote:
> yes but is the "duplicate" mail really needed, Right now this thread
> is 10 e-mails long when there is only 5 real messages.
> What Im saying is that the system only needs to send out mail when the
> message is added from the system.

I'm seeing the duplicate emails also. Checking the bugs@ archive on
leaf shows only one email though.

--Bill

#27 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

Bill Marquette wrote:
> On 10/1/06, Jonas Trollvik <> wrote:
>> yes but is the "duplicate" mail really needed, Right now this thread
>> is 10 e-mails long when there is only 5 real messages.
>> What Im saying is that the system only needs to send out mail when the
>> message is added from the system.
>
> I'm seeing the duplicate emails also. Checking the bugs@ archive on
> leaf shows only one email though.

could you or jonas forward both copies including headers so that i can see what is going on?

thanks
simon

#28 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

testing more...

#29 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> could you or jonas forward both copies including headers so that i can see what is going on?

okay, testing. this should be fixed now.

#30 Updated by jontro about 8 years ago

Thanks, looking good!

On 10/2/06, Simon 'corecode' Schubert <> wrote:
> Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> > could you or jonas forward both copies including headers so that i can see what is going on?
>
> okay, testing. this should be fixed now.
>
> --
> Serve - BSD +++ RENT this banner advert +++ ASCII Ribbon /"\
> Work - Mac +++ space for low €€€ NOW!1 +++ Campaign \ /
> Party Enjoy Relax | http://dragonflybsd.org Against HTML \
> Dude 2c 2 the max ! http://golden-apple.biz Mail + News / \
>
>
>
>

#31 Updated by joerg about 8 years ago

On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 09:13:49PM +0200, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> Bill Marquette wrote:
> >On 10/1/06, Jonas Trollvik <> wrote:
> >>yes but is the "duplicate" mail really needed, Right now this thread
> >>is 10 e-mails long when there is only 5 real messages.
> >>What Im saying is that the system only needs to send out mail when the
> >>message is added from the system.
> >
> >I'm seeing the duplicate emails also. Checking the bugs@ archive on
> >leaf shows only one email though.
>
> could you or jonas forward both copies including headers so that i can see
> what is going on?

It duplicates mail send e.g. to submit@.

Joerg

#32 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

testing mail address

#33 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

testing mail address try2

#34 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

try3, sorry for the disturbance

#35 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

try 3 part 2, still sorry

#36 Updated by wbh about 8 years ago

Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:

Simon,

I can alias-up some temporary virtual addresses that point back to address(es)
of your choice if that helps for 'non-intrusive' testing.

Bill

#37 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

thanks, the problem is that I have to route the mails exactly through the system like they will, otherwise all the checks don't work :/

but now it is sorted out. hooray!

cheers
simon

#38 Updated by corecode about 8 years ago

testing duplicate suppression

#39 Updated by justin almost 8 years ago

Done with testing.

Also available in: Atom PDF