DragonFlyBSD

:Hi all,
:http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~joerg/patch.diff
:contains the last missing piece to remove unnecessary line limits in
:patch(1). Please test or review, I'd like to have this in the tree soon
::-)
:
:Joerg

This is kinda messy:

#define __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS

Is there any way to not use those extensions ?

-Matt
                    Matthew Dillon 
                    <dillon@backplane.com>

:
:Hi all,
:http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~joerg/patch.diff
:contains the last missing piece to remove unnecessary line limits in
:patch(1). Please test or review, I'd like to have this in the tree soon
::-)
:
:Joerg

Also, full_fgets() can be cleaned up a bit.  Just add a local
    resize_len variable instead of copying 'buf_len * 2' all over
    the place, and also clean up the last bit to read something like
    this:

ret = fgets(resize_buf + buf_len, resize_len - buf_len, fp);
    buf = resize_buf;
    buf_len = resize_len;

-Matt
                    Matthew Dillon 
                    <dillon@backplane.com>

On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 10:29:06AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:

:Hi all,
:http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~joerg/patch.diff
:contains the last missing piece to remove unnecessary line limits in
:patch(1). Please test or review, I'd like to have this in the tree soon
::-)
:
:Joerg

This is kinda messy:

#define __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS

Is there any way to not use those extensions ?

This is a standard macro and part of C99.

Joerg

:On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 10:29:06AM 0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:>
:> :Hi all,
:> :http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~joerg/patch.diff
:> :contains the last missing piece to remove unnecessary line limits in
:> :patch(1). Please test or review, I'd like to have this in the tree soon
:> ::)
:> :
:> :Joerg
:>
:> This is kinda messy:
:>
:> #define __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS
:>
:> Is there any way to not use those extensions ?
:
:This is a standard macro and part of C99.
:
:Joerg

I really dislike having to pre-define anything prior to doing
   an #include.  There are a few places where we have no choice,
   but if something is going to be 'standard C' then I just do not
   accept that it must require a pre-defined macro to operate properly.

I suppose if you really, really want to use the macro you can make
   it a -D option in the compile line.  That is, fix the Makefile rather
   then put the #define in the source code.

-Matt
                    Matthew Dillon 
                    <dillon@backplane.com>

The patch on leaf seems to be no longer available. Also there was a patch(1)
sync with OpenBSD after the creation date of the submitted patch.
How can I check if the line limit is still there?

I think this can be closed. New patch uses mmap, AFAIR

plan_a() function uses indeed mmap() and comments state "/* Try
keeping everything in memory. */"
Is that what you meant?

2009/8/26 Simon 'corecode' Schubert (via DragonFly issue tracker)
<sinknull@leaf.dragonflybsd.org>:

Simon 'corecode' Schubert <corecode@fs.ei.tum.de> added the comment:

I think this can be closed.  New patch uses mmap, AFAIR

_____________________________________________
DragonFly issue tracker <bugs@lists.dragonflybsd.org>
<http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issue240>
_____________________________________________