Bug #3011
open
dragonfly/sys/dev/netif/re/re.c: suspicious code ?
Added by dcb over 7 years ago.
Updated almost 2 years ago.
Description
dragonfly/sys/dev/netif/re/re.c:6567] -> [dragonfly/sys/dev/netif/re/re.c:6567]: (style) Same expression on both sides of '||'.
[dragonfly/sys/dev/netif/re/re.c:21948] -> [dragonfly/sys/dev/netif/re/re.c:21948]: (style) Same expression on both sides of '||'.
[dragonfly/sys/dev/netif/re/re.c:21949] -> [dragonfly/sys/dev/netif/re/re.c:21949]: (style) Same expression on both sides of '||'.
[dragonfly/sys/dev/netif/re/re.c:22044] -> [dragonfly/sys/dev/netif/re/re.c:22044]: (style) Same expression on both sides of '||'.
[dragonfly/sys/dev/netif/re/re.c:22104] -> [dragonfly/sys/dev/netif/re/re.c:22104]: (style) Same expression on both sides of '||'.
Taking the first one as an example:
if ((sc->re_type MACFG_24) || (sc->re_type MACFG_24) || (sc->re_type == MACFG_26))
MACFG_25 exists. Possible cut'n'paste error ?
Note, this is directly imported vendor code, used by chip
initialization. Since these chips contains all kinds of weird things,
I'd not change it, if possible.
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 4:19 PM, <bugtracker-admin@leaf.dragonflybsd.org> wrote:
Issue #3011 has been reported by dcb.
----------------------------------------
Bug #3011: dragonfly/sys/dev/netif/re/re.c: suspicious code ?
http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/3011
- Author: dcb
- Status: New
- Priority: Normal
- Assignee:
- Category:
- Target version:
----------------------------------------
dragonfly/sys/dev/netif/re/re.c:6567] -> [dragonfly/sys/dev/netif/re/re.c:6567]: (style) Same expression on both sides of '||'.
[dragonfly/sys/dev/netif/re/re.c:21948] -> [dragonfly/sys/dev/netif/re/re.c:21948]: (style) Same expression on both sides of '||'.
[dragonfly/sys/dev/netif/re/re.c:21949] -> [dragonfly/sys/dev/netif/re/re.c:21949]: (style) Same expression on both sides of '||'.
[dragonfly/sys/dev/netif/re/re.c:22044] -> [dragonfly/sys/dev/netif/re/re.c:22044]: (style) Same expression on both sides of '||'.
[dragonfly/sys/dev/netif/re/re.c:22104] -> [dragonfly/sys/dev/netif/re/re.c:22104]: (style) Same expression on both sides of '||'.
Taking the first one as an example:
if ((sc->re_type MACFG_24) || (sc->re_type MACFG_24) || (sc->re_type == MACFG_26))
MACFG_25 exists. Possible cut'n'paste error ?
--
You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it.
To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/my/account
--
Tomorrow Will Never Die
- Status changed from New to In Progress
Yes,
it could be a typo, and MACFG_25 is intended, it could as well be a sloppy intentional last minute "fix" and the intention is to exclude MACFG_25 from the if(). My bet is typo, though.
I mailed Realtek about it. Let's see if they get back to me.
I haven't looked exactly when this was fixed, but these redundant expressions are not present anymore in re.c in current version of the driver.
This can be closed I guess (I have no right to do this).
Also available in: Atom
PDF