DragonFlyBSD

There is feedback in the dmesg, if number of RX/TX desc is tuned to a
wrong value. Does it fit your needs?

Best Regards,
sephe

Not wrong, but corrected according to hardware capabilities ;). But you have
to know the code to have this knowledge.

And even in this case if there is silence in dmesg regarding Rx and Tx
descriptors, success isn't the only option. You might make typo while
editing loader.conf for example.

regards,

:Not wrong, but corrected according to hardware capabilities ;). But you have
:to know the code to have this knowledge.
:
:And even in this case if there is silence in dmesg regarding Rx and Tx
:descriptors, success isn't the only option. You might make typo while
:editing loader.conf for example.
:
:regards,
:
:--
:Hasso Tepper

Was there a resolution to this?  Do we want to still add the additional
    verbosity as per the patch or would it be easier to just change the
    device printf to be a little more verbose ?

-Matt
                    Matthew Dillon 
                    <dillon@backplane.com>

I have no objection to add two read only sysctl nodes; It may be
better than parsing dmesg if certain program needs those values. If
Matt thinks it is OK too, I will commit it.

Best Regards,
sephe

:I have no objection to add two read only sysctl nodes; It may be
:better than parsing dmesg if certain program needs those values. If
:Matt thinks it is OK too, I will commit it.
:
:Best Regards,
:sephe

I think its probably a bit bloated, but even so it IS a reasonable
    solution and we need to move on, so please go ahead and commit it.

-Matt
                    Matthew Dillon 
                    <dillon@backplane.com>

Committed! Thanks!

Best Regards,
sephe