Project

General

Profile

Actions
Copy link

Bug #1655

closed

DFBSD 2.5.1 - fsx fails on UFS filesystem

Added by tuxillo almost 15 years ago. Updated over 14 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
-
Target version:
-
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:

Description

Hi,

Playing around a bit with vkernels I found that fsx failed quite early on them
in a UFS filesystem, so I wanted to try on a real machine, which produced the
same result.

Check http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~tuxillo/archive/temp/test.fsx.dat.fsxlog

I've passed fsx also on my HAMMER filesystem without issues (around 5 minutes also).

Is there any known issue with UFS that makes fsx to fail?

Cheers,
Antonio Huete

Actions
Copy link
 #1

Updated by tuxillo almost 15 years ago

Hi,

I've just run fsx on a 2.4.1 VM with UFS filesystem for about 1.30h without a
single failure. See the log here:

http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~tuxillo/archive/temp/2_4_1_test.fsx.dat.fsxlog

Cheers,
Antonio Huete

Actions
Copy link
 #2

Updated by dillon almost 15 years ago

:...
:Check http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~tuxillo/archive/temp/test.fsx.dat.fsxlo=
:g
:
:I've passed fsx also on my HAMMER filesystem without issues (around 5 minut=
:es also).
:
:Is there any known issue with UFS that makes fsx to fail?
:
:Cheers,
:Antonio Huete

There is fragility betwen the VM system and the filesystem.  I've
    slowly been consolidating the VM getpages/putpages code and some
    of the new read-ahead code in vm_fault broke UFS's getpages.
I just pushed fixes.  Try it now.
-Matt
                    Matthew Dillon 
                    <>
Actions
Copy link
 #3

Updated by alexh over 14 years ago

Antonio,
Did you try to reproduce the problem after the fixes were pushed?

Cheers,
Alex Hornung

Actions
Copy link
 #4

Updated by tuxillo over 14 years ago

Hi,

This can be closed. It survived a 18h test.

testcalls = 23412481

Cheers,
Antonio Huete

Actions
Copy link

Also available in: Atom PDF